There are two excellent cosmetic procedure options available for people that want to turn back the hands of time and look years younger: facelift surgery and a two-year-old procedure known as Ultherapy, both of which are popular options among dermatology patients today. Depending on a person’s unique situation, both procedures offer benefits and risks that should be considered by patients before making a decision about how to proceed with either treatment. Below is some detailed information about each option.
The Case for Electing Ultherapy Instead of a Facelift
Ultherapy is a skin treatment that employs the use of ultrasound technology to create new collagen within the skin by heating the tissue just below the skin’s surface. The reason that so many consumers are excited about this procedure is that it is relatively inexpensive, especially when compared to a traditional facelift. Additionally, Ultherapy has proven to deliver excellent results over a course of 2-3 months, and for people who can’t bear the thought of surgery, Ultherapy is a viable noninvasive alternative.
Interested parties can target part of their face using Ultherapy, focusing on problem areas like the neck or upper portion of the face, depending on their particular concerns. Fees vary widely between offices and cities, with an average price of about $3500 for having the full face treated. Some consumers elect to spend a portion of that price, concentrating instead on the upper face for about $1500 or the lower face for about $2500.
Another powerful reason for considering Ultherapy is the fact that there is little or no downtime. After having the procedure, a consumer can return to work the very same day or at the latest, the next day. The fact that no foreign substances are used during the process is also an attractive aspect of the treatment.
The Reasons for Getting a Facelift Rather than Ultherapy
There are a couple of major drawbacks that can negatively impact a consumer’s serious consideration of Ultherapy. For older consumers with major sagging problems, Ultherapy is probably not going to provide the same amazing results that a facelift can, as Ultherapy promotes the gradual development of collagen within the skin. Ultherapy is designed for a younger age group, working best for middle-aged consumers younger than 65.
Another reason cited for electing to have a facelift instead of Ultherapy is based on the amount of time it takes to see results. Facelift results are immediate. As soon as the bruising and swelling go away, which takes about two weeks, a person’s appearance is dramatically improved. Comparatively, results after Ultherapy can take a few months to become obvious.
Determining Which Treatment is Best for You
Depending on which doctor you consult, the results of Ultherapy last for anywhere between a year and two years. As compared to Botox treatments, this amount of time seems acceptable. But when compared to a facelift, which lasts seven to ten years, consumers may favor a facelift and the extra time to enjoy the results before having to contemplate undergoing another procedure. Determine which treatment is the best option for you, and meet with a trusted-dermatologist that can provide you with additional information for each procedure.